InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 657
Posts 24624
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 07/16/2006

Re: tw0122 post# 39476

Friday, 08/02/2013 6:09:06 PM

Friday, August 02, 2013 6:09:06 PM

Post# of 68424
IMO, it's not a positive or negative in the grand scheme of things. All I'm trying to convey is that the material within the PACER document shouldn't have created any more excitement than there was at the beginning of the day. That said, hype is huge AH's, so won't surprise me to see a $4.25 open on Monday followed by a collapse. Final ruling on R&R is all that matters, but even then, Google will appeal and this will drag on alot longer than you think. I'm just making a call on a one-day basis, but as always, those that don't agree attack and that's okay too. I can handle it. LOL. And no, I'm not short .... or long ....

"If you are the same joe natural that publishes articles on SEEKING alpha why would a positive be a negative. Are you short the stock?"