Thursday, August 01, 2013 4:39:43 PM
I agree it is good to see it close up a little higher. It is still much lower than what it should be in my opinion.
Further delays seem to be inherently unfair to Vringo at this point. I would assume that the court is aware of this and will act accordingly.
By reading Vringo's recent filing on the appeal; I think it is apparent that the parties are not talking settlement at this time nor have they been for the past two months. They remain polar opposites. This will have to be resolved by the Judge and it should be done now. This egg is hardboiled and will never hatch so waiting further is pointless.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM