OneMeta Inc (ONEI)

[tenantprotection]

Sprint and T-Mobile- Patent Infringement


The Sprint "Drive First" and the T-Mobile "DriveSmart" app.s implement the identical claims in the Websafety Patent. In other words, they identify the speed of the vehicle, cut off text/cell and then send a message to a third party. This is exactly what the Websafety patent claims.


Sprint's Drive First

T-Mobile's DriveSmart


Websaftey Abstract Claims;

A method of inhibiting a function of a multi-function portable personal communications device includes determining a first position of the personal communications device, after a predetermined time interval, determining a second position of the personal communications device, determining the distance between the first position and the second position, determining the time interval in which the personal communications device moved from the first position and the second position, calculating an average velocity of the personal communications device based on the first position, the second position and the time interval and, if the average velocity of the personal communication device exceeds a predetermined value, inhibiting a function of the personal communications device.


***One of the AEGIS MOBILITY Patents claims an identical functionality as to determining the speed of the vehicle and then cutting off service, which is similar to the statements in Websafety's Abstract.HOWEVER, the CLAIMS rule. I will take a look at the Websafety claims later today and compare them with the claims of AEGIS. By the way, look who filed the Patent claims for AEGIS. It was the law firm of Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP. The same law firm Websafety JUST hired. This is great. They will have first hand as to whether AEGIS claims are identical to the claims of Websafety (But there may be a conflict of interest here for the attorneys).


Lady's and Gentilement, IF THE WEBSAFETY PATENT CAN BE UPHELD IN COURT, WE HAVE OURSELVES A MEGGA KILLER STOCK THAT WILL BLOW MINDS WHEN IT POPS. Just the PATENT alone will make the company and pop the stock even if they never launch their app. because other major carrier companies have already launched a similar app. Websafety can just sit back and collect the licensing fees. This is just too good (The KEY is for the Courts to up hold the Websafety's patent claims; but just filing a lawsuit against the major carriers will pop the stock high).



PATENT LAWSUITS

All Websafety has to do is to file an infringement lawsuit against these major communication companies and the stock will go to the moon.[url] Even if they lose their Patent lawsuit, Websafety's stock will pop high until the resolution of that lawsuit. And if they win, you are looking at a MONSTER STOCK. Thus, NO matter which way the lawsuit would go, it spells PROFIT, PROFIT, PROFIT.


AS A SHAREHOLDER OF WEBSAFETY, I AM GOING TO HAVE MY ATTORNEY CONTACT WEBSAFETY'S LAYWERS AND DEMAND THAT THEY MAIL OUT "TIMELY" CEASE AND DESIST LETTERS TO ALL THE MAJOR COMMUNICATION COMPANIES USING A SIMILAR TECHNOLOGY NOW THAT THE PATENT HAS BEEN ISSUED. IF THEY FAIL TO DO SO, BY LAW, MY ATTORNEY IS ALLOWED TO SEND THOSE LETTERS OUT ON BEHALF OF WEBSAFETY AND TO INITIATE AN INFRINGEMENT LAWSUIT AGAINST THE MAJOR CARRIERS ON BEHALF OF WEBSAFETY. THIS IS JUST TOO BIG TO PASS UP.


I AM VERY SERIOUS ABOUT THIS. I AM THE ONE WHO SUED PAYPAL, INC AND THEY PAID ME A SETTLEMENT IN THE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS: Mehmet v. Paypal, Inc. U.S. District Court, Cal.