InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,477.90
(
0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,129.60
(
-0.24%
)
Dow Jones
39,127.80
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.20
(
-0.33%
)
Bitcoin
60,999.95
(
0.31%
)
Post# of 252388
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

caravon

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 13
Posts 1058
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/21/2007

caravon

Re: mcbio post# 164589

Monday, 07/29/2013 8:32:57 AM

Monday, July 29, 2013 8:32:57 AM

Post# of 252388
ARQL NSCLC

I went back and checked the prior presentation and I believe the reference was only to "substantial improvement" and not also to "stat sig." So, presumably results were not stat sig or they would have said so but let's wait to see the actual data at ESMO.



Taking into account that there were ~230 c-MET high pts in both arms, the stat-sig results would require HR <0.65
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up