InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 42
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2013

Re: romang post# 541

Monday, 07/22/2013 2:17:23 PM

Monday, July 22, 2013 2:17:23 PM

Post# of 588
Total liabilities went down from 2.9 billion to 2.7 billion. Not much, but look at the assets. Total Assets are the exact same value as the total liabilities right to the last digit. This is fishy accounting.

The "property held for sale" had not been valued and included with the assets before but they value it NOW at 1.8 billion and add it to the assets in June AFTER the 363 sale is finalized??? Seems like they did not want to publicize that value before the auction winner was announced.

Despite the inclusion of the 1.8 billion with the assets, the total assets have become even lower than the liabilities. They must have manipulated the other asset numbers to keep Total Assets lower than Liabilities. If their current assets were > their liabilities, the 363 sale might be halted because the company would be cash positive.

This is my "novice" 2 cents.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.