InvestorsHub Logo

es1

Followers 153
Posts 16535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/13/2009

es1

Re: AlanC post# 133573

Sunday, 07/21/2013 8:47:39 PM

Sunday, July 21, 2013 8:47:39 PM

Post# of 165855
LOL Oh I am terrified of identifying myself. Scott might scold me for getting everyone to look at what he is doing with the shareholders money.

Do you know what he did with it? Or are you afraid of identifying your investment as a fraud?

Maybe the shareholders should actually ask and get blown off by the management so they can see for themselves how unimportant the shareholders are here.

Here is the thing. You apparently think that I would be afraid to call Scott and identify myself as someone who thinks he has not been truthful. I am not but I find it odd that you would expect me or any shareholder to be afraid of voicing their opinion.

Are you saying that share holders who suck up to Scott will get more or better information? Do you think a shareholder who is not happy would be ignored by Scott?

If anything Scott should go out of his way for someone like me to SHOW me what is wrong by pointing it out in the public information.

It is Scott that would blow me off because Scott would be the one afraid to speak to me. If he had the information publicly available every long on this board would have slammed me with it. But that doesnt happen because the information is not out there.

Longs dont know what the CEO is doing with their money and are afraid to call and find out the truth.
They get mad because they are losing and the people like me are telling them they should search for the truth. Nobody wants to be a victim of a lie. They would rather hide from the truth as long as they can and they get pretty mad when you point out the truth.

That applies to longs and it applies to Scott.
Scott also would rather hide from the truth. That is why everything he says is a boiler plate comment. "should be, could be, might be...."