InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 90
Posts 2337
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/21/2010

Re: EarnestDD post# 27095

Thursday, 07/18/2013 11:27:59 AM

Thursday, July 18, 2013 11:27:59 AM

Post# of 38473
The VERY FACT that he (assuming Wilma's story accurately reflects the phone call discussion topics) conveyed MATERIAL information in such a manner is blatant disregard for SEC/FINRA regulations.

You simply CANNOT tell one investor something while leading the masses down the primrose path. It flies in the face of all rules surrounding dissemination of material data. I don't know about you, but I'd say with certainty that the timeliness of the China deals are supremely material.

What Wilma needs to do is contact the SEC, get deposed, write a statement of fact(s), and offer up any evidence of the phone conversations that she has which could help her/others recover losses or portions of losses going forward.

I've no reason to not believe Wilma was told what she claims to have been told. I have every reason to suspect she was taken advantage of by a con man who's simply running his con and told her all sorts of enticing fractions of a whole in an effort to take her money. I believe he knowingly, purposefully, and maliciously targeted her as soon as he accepted the call upon identifying her as a "mark" to take money from.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.