InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 92
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/10/2013

Re: Spec_Investor post# 5447

Monday, 07/15/2013 3:33:55 PM

Monday, July 15, 2013 3:33:55 PM

Post# of 131489
Does not really matter what i think. Facts are facts.
1. The company has never made more than 1000 per year in rev.

2. Highly questionable how the company raise investments at 0.001 share issuance never disclosing how much it raised.

The patent maybe worth a value or not but giving the past non-transparency with this company i believe the only people benefiting are the insiders. The avg investors get the wrong end of the stick.

First of all the patent must truly be worth some value, secondly the patent must be in used by other huge telcos which would violate vplm patent. so far i do not see any of the above.
Nortel, cisco, siemen, qualcom, and all the major telco have their own patents. NSA went straight to Google, Skype, Fb etc.
I have not heard of NSA approaching vplm so why would that change. Which company do u see using or paying for vplm patent.
Patent itself is not enough VPLM will need to deploy its VOIP software and services and must have massive volume of calls for anyone to approach vplm.

What good is vplm patent when it is not in use by the general public. 0 voip volume call means NSA is going to track 0 activities with vplm patent.

I think the company is hyping these patents. (In my opinion).
I am confused how all these readily available info is disregarded and all we hear is 1 billion dollar buyout.?


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News