InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,626.02
(
0.54%
)
US TECH 100
18,986.40
(
0.30%
)
Dow Jones
41,393.78
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
71.83
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
59,819.01
(
-1.26%
)
Post# of 67010
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

longcgfia15

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 7
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/07/2012

longcgfia15

Re: sanbrunobaby post# 65328

Monday, 07/15/2013 2:51:18 PM

Monday, July 15, 2013 2:51:18 PM

Post# of 67010
A good question Mr. sanbrunobaby, would be why would the owners of Goldfields use the Canadian standard NI-43-101 in any shape or form when it has been shown that the NI is not recongized by any US agency and is illegal to mention the Canadian report for a United States owned company that is not associated with Canada in any way. Goldfields is a Nevada entity, based soley in Colorado.

Isn't this an extremely risky for Mr. Guyer to repeatedly use potentialy bogus information in a 10Q?

thank you
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up