InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,567.19
(
1.06%
)
US TECH 100
19,828.00
(
0.95%
)
Dow Jones
39,375.87
(
0.17%
)
Brent Oil
86.78
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
56,727.97
(
0.14%
)
Post# of 74729
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Clutch Cargo

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 281
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/14/2012

Clutch Cargo

Re: AstnMartin post# 64068

Monday, 07/15/2013 2:07:45 PM

Monday, July 15, 2013 2:07:45 PM

Post# of 74729
It CERTAINLY is ... and it raises two very important questions:

1. Why would a company that's been "going out of business" since September of 2011 (like ASYI has), renew the ownership of its web domain for an additional 5 years?

2. And if that company were going to spin-off AERO and then merge with GCS ... why would that company even NEED its old web site? In fact, why didn't ASYI simply terminate it web page back in September of 2011, when Dynamic yanked it's license agreement? Why did ASYI simply "TEMPORARILY DISABLE" the web site?

What ahhala uncovered --- while certainly interesting --- simply doesn't make practical business sense.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up