![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Saturday, July 13, 2013 3:16:12 PM
Given the fact that the firm of L L Bradford stated that the company had basically no cash going into 2012 and that no new unrestricted cash has been generated during the reporting period then the agreement with VSTA could not logically close on the dates in the announcement.
I am not a lawyer and do not understand the difference between the concepts of misrepresentation, deception, commercial fraud or criminal fraud. I would appreciate definitions on these concepts. I would further raise the professional and non-accusatory question if knowing making an agreement with VSTA and publicly announcing while there is no reasonable means to close on the dates reports could fit any of the above definitions. If any of these fit, does it place BGMO at any legal risk and by extension the value of our shareholdings?
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM