Just had to go there, right? I don't want this to turn into a debate on the elementary difference between killing/terminating an already formed human being versus stopping the egg from meeting its maker in the first place.
One of these is good sense, responsible thought, and solves a problem, while the other makes up for poor judgment, lack of any responsible thinking, and is, indeed, taking another human life, which is simply wrong morally and should be legally in all but a forced situation, which breaks moral and legal code FIRST.
But, back to my solution. By simply telling people they have a right to dip in the welfare pot of NEED, but they have NO RIGHT to bring more people intentionally to that pot, it would solve a lot of issues economically.
