InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,615.35
(
0.55%
)
US TECH 100
19,803.20
(
0.64%
)
Dow Jones
40,000.90
(
0.62%
)
Brent Oil
84.57
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
57,916.59
(
0.05%
)
Post# of 45771
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

d4diddy

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

d4diddy

Re: Crow3 post# 6380

Thursday, 12/22/2005 7:05:43 PM

Thursday, December 22, 2005 7:05:43 PM

Post# of 45771
Crow, the patent examiner clearly states that if they use the term "at least one meter" instead of "significant distance" that it would be acceptable.

The examiner references paragraphs 22 & 25 of the application where it states the stand-off distance is one to two meters (depending on conditions) with a integration time of 5-45 seconds.

I'm not sure why it's taking so long to make the correction!

Maybe they need another three months to think it over! LOL
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up