![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Monday, July 08, 2013 4:32:12 PM
I have a question for you, that has never made sense to me:
If the FHFA, DeMarco, and FnF knew that the upcoming years would be highly profitable, why did they ever agree to the 3rd Amendment of the PSPA (i.e. the dividend sweep)? For it to have been passed so close to the profitability period (within 6 months) has never really made sense.
I know that the intention of the 3rd Amendment of the PSPA was to prevent FnF from making Treasury draws just to pay their dividend obligation. But to agree to such drastic measures just doesn't seem like sound business practice.
I'd be interested to hear your thoughts/comments on this.
Panther Minerals Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • PURR • Jul 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM