Sunday, July 07, 2013 4:38:15 PM
POLR was suspended due to these reasons:
A prior suspended company from 2011 was suspended by the SEC with these reasons given:
Sounds extremely similar to what POLR was suspended for - doesn't it? Note the absence of any verbiage management had violated securities law. Then again only a court can determine that. No mention management was profiting from alleged stock promoting activity. Two years later the SEC filed litigation outlining how the CEO paid 3rd party affiliates to sell billions of unregistered shares in the background on his behalf. And yes, that is a violation of securities laws. Semantics isn't going to help you.
The Jewel of the Mind is Colored with the Hue of what it Imagines
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM