Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[Tom Orrow]

The bold numbers equal the unbold numbers to within a reasonable order of magnitude. So you are showing us that the bottom line is Sarissa's cost of business. I don't see anything anomalous in the numbers. Call it exploration costs, or management fees, whatever -- the bottom line is a consistent year over year budget and it's either spent on drilling, or studies, or pursuing financing. Which do you want? The difference between 2009 and 2012 is how the resources were assigned due to changes in the business environment. Maybe 2012 results weren't as consistent, but seems to me that the company is actually closer to the goal line. My opinion -- different than yours -- and starting to get overstated.