Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Sogo]

Any contract signed "under duress" can be challenged. Paulson's treatment of fnma in 2008 could certainly be considered "duress".

Could the argument that the conservatorship itself was illegal be strong enough to withstand the might of all the full on legislative attacks and legal defense teams that the elite can and will mount against fnma in their attempt to yet again enrich the big banks and get away with stealing wealth and assets from regular people?