Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[BOC1]

1. Your not reading it right. The defaults are against those guys that claims to own bleam claimig the owners sold bleam without their consent. vplm sued those guys, those guys basically refuse to deal with vplm so vplm got default against them (the guys that claim to own bleam)

2.vplm and kipping and his offshore company platinum tribe refuse to honor the deal because of those guys listed in item 1 above. Others says it is just excuses and intent to defraud bleam and vplm and kipping new of those allegations and agreed to move ahead with the deal in writting.

3.The real owners of bleam countersued vplm, kipping and his offshore company platinum tribe for fraud.
the bleam guys got default against kipping company platium tribe because kipping refused to address the complaint.

4. the countersue against kipping and vplm is going to trial and i would tend to believe the bleam guys refuse to settle out of court rather wants to exposed the truth.

I not sure how vplm and kipping is going to defend this case when supposedly those guys that started this "they stole our services" item 1 above refuse to be part of this and have no evidence.

in my view its a hear say. hey guess what i own 50% of google, sorry my word is bond i have no documents either to back it up. yet somehow this statement is considered to be valid? maybe the courts in zimbabwe may see this valid but not the courts in the great country of USA.

This case is more interesting than days or our lives and phantom of the opera:)