Medical Marijuana Inc (MJNA)

[Det_Robert_Thorne]

Yes, the company needs to address 7/2/12 filing

Yes, the filing of July 2, 2012 (adopted 6/21/12) has the same issue as all of the others that were rescinded, in that they checked the box indicating that shareholder approval of the increase wasn't necessary.

It should therefore also be null and void.

The company should explain why it didn't also rescind this filing, especially because, since the filings before it were wrong, then the 600M they state as the starting point was incorrect, and that would require a correction in and of itself.

Was it the usual sloppiness?


One last thing I've edited into the original post:

This could mean that they'll have to amend the 1Q/13 audited report to reflect the true share count, and is another reason why they won't want to audit 2011, but will wait until 2014 to show an audited 2012 and 2013.

IMO