Wilma,
If he said it over the phone with you, then have him reiterate in email to you.
Why?
Because it's material the shareholders and to the share price if true.
Consider it a litmus test.
A.) if true, and if he repeats it via email then he considers it
1.) material to shareholders and share price
2.) previously publicly disclosed
B.) if it's not true he WILL NOT confirm with you via any other media because:
1.) it'll be admissible
2.) fraudulent misrepresentation
3.) insider trading (due to material nature of accurate or inaccurate info)
Until you take action on this litmus test I want you to know that you've had a phone call with a con man. You're being conned. I know you're being conned and the only way to prove me wrong is to take the litmus test and achieve results from line item A.
I don't debate verifiable and bonafide events. I debate rumor, daydreamer folly, and blatant misrepresentation. If you point me to one materially beneficial, one materially accretive bit of news ill look at it, review it, and weigh it. The problem is that you cannot. You point at toothless PR's while the shares sink...where the PR telling investors to stay clear until management sorts out the toxic debt deals they've signed? WHAT? No PR on that? But plenty of PR's where they claim to tell you how fantastic things are going to be...someday.
Oh... And quit telling readers how you don't care what others think of you. You do...it's part of the human condition to seek approval and acceptance. PROOF? Sure... You seem to care plenty about what people who AGREE with you think of you, and markedly less of those who disagree with you.
