rj
You’re welcome.
And yes. Continued patience is our only at this point viable option. And again yes. The restricted stock and the fact that the vast majority of same was issued at prices ranging from .0002 - .0005 does very much play a major role in defining our overall future. Why no reverse sub-.0005. And why in fact in all likelihood no reverse supra-.0005 either. At least not in the absence of company fundamental and operational reality that will preclude a full and rapid post-split retrace. But even then we need consider that a for example 30-bagger from .0001 is an ROI outcome far more feasible/achievable than is the same from say .10 or .50. The only way for all involved to maximally profit/gain in the end is for management to proceed/continue with the favorable share structure adjustments. Management want riches too. They’ve very clearly said as much.
k9narc...
“Gorb.....I try and base my DD on facts.”
Really?
I got a wet paper bag for you k9. And a C-Note says you can’t think your way out of it.
tony...
You also are welcome. And you’re thinking. And no worries. We’ll get the funding. One way or another. But favorably is always for the best. And always the most difficult approach. Especially for a startup stage outfit. We get the funding the right way? And same says all it needs to. Hard work indeed. Oh and as for...
“Wonder who sent the Funding e-mail”
Someone close enough to know.
And doesn’t that sound promising?
Hmm?
pickspicks1...
“We got anything to get excited about.”
Yep...
Calm, sensible, rational discussion.
tulsatrader...
Well firstly allow me to express my gratitude. My appreciation given the fact that you’ve very kindly taken the time and trouble to have read a great many of my posts. Thank you indeed. And secondly I find it curious that you directly reply to my post and then continue from a third person perspective. Never straying in fact. Anyway, just to TRY to put your mind at ease...
The e-mail in question was far and away authored not by CO himself but rather by CO’s associates. And as for subject matter and contrast and permission? No general offence intended but your attention to detail skills could use a little honing...
“As of this morning Clockwatcher10 has posted emails that CO asked him not to post. It really never was about the subject of the emails that we were interested in. It was and has always been about a persons honor and what a person will do when certain information is presented to him as a test of character. Will this man/woman keep his promise as a gentleman no matter what the out come. Or will this man/woman use this information to conduct an all out attack on a fellow stockholder?”
“a test of character”
And did I not say that a certain other party has been out of the loop from day one? Strings being pulled? All precautions taken? And can you see it? No?
And...
“This morning we received our final answer to these questions. When the Stowe Vermont Email was finally sent Themountnman was at that time instructed not to share any emails with out asking us first. We are pleased to inform the stockholders that themountnman did in fact keep his promise as a gentleman and never once revealed any information that we did not agree upon. Themountnman in our opinion is of the highest caliber and has the utmost Honor among the stockholders.”
“and never once revealed any information that we did not agree upon”
There’s no shortage of folks in this world real fond of grasping at straws and pulling things from thin air. Right?
And as for MY posts in general? I don’t post often but when I do I say what I have to say and I move on for the nonce. And in so doing I add as much value as I can. And while always bearing in mind the uninitiated among us who just might benefit from those such as myself a little more experienced. Not to mention calm, sensible, rational, logical and entirely levelheaded and so on. Unemotional and thinking quickly and clearly at all times. Always well recognizing what’s right vs what’s wrong. What’s needed and what’s for the best vs what isn’t. I don’t post baseless blanket statements. Waste people’s valuable time. I always fully support what I have to say out of consideration for others. Always explaining in full the reasoning behind my musings and more. And never do I rant or rave or point an accusatory finger. Never do I blame any other(s) for decisions I alone have made and I alone am responsible for. And never have I ever nor will I ever allow the sum total of my financial destiny to ride on the back of but a solitary bottom of the barrel OTC sub-penny play. And the vast majority of the posts submitted to the RB PRRM board are the finest of all possible testaments as to why doing so is folly to the nth degree. As is this...
“there is something else that really bothers me”
Life is far too short to let such little things bother you so. It’s only money after all. And life and health and family are far more important.
So no worries hmm? I’m not the enemy.
And you’re welcome.
Oh and you forgot to thank me for sharing that e-mail. The one you read.
Oh and just so’s you know...
The preceding was written in a respectful tone.
Really it was.
Hope you and the rest had a pleasant weekend.
Interesting week ahead.
Oh and if you hear anything about that funding deal? Or that bigger company? Well be a good soul and be sure to let the rest of know huh? We’d all of us be ever so grateful.
Really we would.
Oh and...
Thanks in advance.
themountnman
AI
