Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[geocappy1]

Back to your 15/25% MOS improvement - In 2nd line Bavi had 100% improvement that was reduced to 60% because of the Fargo incident. Well, if Bavi only works equally well in 1st line we should get at least 60 to 100%, and if your argument about Bavi working better for healthier patients holds any water we should see 100% plus. Yet, after presenting your case fairly well you settle for a measly 15/25% MOS improvement. Please explain.

This is a false argument because it assumes that chemo works the same in 1st line as it does in 2nd line. It is quite possible that the chemo agent is much more effective in 1st line which would make it more difficult for bavi to increase results in 1st line the same as it did in 2nd line.