BGallatin:
Bashing isn't acknowledging the absence of positive catalysts. Bashing is making things up in efforts to sway emotional responses towards a position towards a negative bias.
Facts are facts. The dilutive rate at this point makes keeping gains improbable...I'd use the word impossible but some deluded long would cite me on "nothing is impossible".
Think it through before resigning yourself to total irrecoverable losses. The company is paying salaries with toxic dilutive shares. What's Solomon, Guest, Martinez make per year? (I'm asking, I don't recall off the top of my head... One number sticks out... $176,000 for one of them?)
Quick math at today's share price:
One annual salary of $176,000 in shares:
70,400,000 shares.
52 weeks in a year:
1,353,846 dilutive shares added per week to pay JUST ONE SALARY.
Now... What is today's buy volume? It was 17k last I checked... Likely between 17k and 100k now.
Meaning the buy volume cannot even keep pace with the dilutive salary conversions and the salary isn't even in the same ballpark as the known company debt, and interest payments.
Retailers would have to buy in excess of 10 million shares per week EVERY WEEK of the year just to try to keep pace with the dilution AND THAT WOULD ONLY KEEP THE STOCK AT THE CURRENT PRICE. That's just to roughly break even each week.
The numbers on the actual "stock friction" (theoretical buy rate that it takes for buyers to overcome sellors and raise the stock price a given percentage) is staggering.
Solomon, Guest, and Martinez are filthy scammers living relative lives of luxury in Newport hiding their scam from their own friends and family while acting reputable. Their press releases contain red flags. Notice how they toss around terms like "major, growth and expansion, in negotiations" etc, with all these huge energy firms but almost never ACTUALLY NAME NAMES NOR DO THEY EVER RELEASE accretive values of the deals in their PR's??
Notice how when you ask them about that fact they cite "confidentiality clauses"?
Does the question in your head ever come up: "how can this deal be confidential if its material to stockholders?"
THAT QUESTION should pop up... Because the FACT IS that "material to shareholders" trumps secret handshakes and winks.
See interesting Uni Pixel Inc. article on pump and dumps and check out their chart. See if any Uni Pixel red flags are mimicked in UBRG PR's.
Look, I know you've lost all but a few hundred bucks. I really wish we were not even discussing this. I wish UBRG would announce something with gnashing teeth that really had bite and could swamp the shorts... I wish you were up a fortune. I'm sorry you're not.
But is there really any reason to give Solomom, Guest, and Martinez your last few hundred bucks so they can spend it on a a nice Friday lunch, or a weekend in their beautiful homes and trophy shallow wives?
AI
