InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1681
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/17/2010

Re: Zorch305 post# 10004

Friday, 06/21/2013 11:07:17 AM

Friday, June 21, 2013 11:07:17 AM

Post# of 55135
I completely agree that in such stocks one has to accept the speculative aspect but there should be some reason for the speculation. Unfortunately this stock I took a position on a few years ago, and I accept is a loss but I dont accept misinformation.

You refuse to give any logical back-up for your views and employ circular reasononing that doesnt make sense- so I just ask the questions.

1. "is qualified to be CEO ."Why , "because he has a MBA". There is no record of any legitamate MBA from the place he mentioned.Why does MBA qualify CEO ? "Because CEO's claim that MBA".
2. MBA is fake as far as all information out there, I am open minded please supply 1 bit of information .
3. BTDG has failed to generate revenue, cash flow, or even that businesses they claim to have acquired exist. How does this generate confidence for BTDG to execute any current announced plans ?
4. "filings are the justification" - oh come on, just to give one example- financial statements re-stated, and CEO claims they are in accordance with GAAP when they are not. Uses SEC reporting company forms when company is not SEC reporting.

Let's be open here- if you had an employee who had failed at EVERYTHING for 3 years, would you keep the employee on ? Let me ask you- how can you promote a stock with no justificaton to unsuspecting investors ?

I am not unduly beating up CEO, he probably has a level of technical competence, but no evident CEO skills- cant generate revenue, cash flow, investment, execute on new initiatives, therefore how can you say he is a qualified CEO ? If I am wrong please do show me some , even 1 item that has been successful the last 3 years.