Well, Mr. Paul Adams, if you are Mr. Paul Adams of USFF, it was kind of you to dismiss the claims of a poster. But, that was one poster who indicated he had insights born of breaking bread with those supposedly in charge of this company. So, he did not know of what he spoke? Okay. What about the other posters? What about that audit? What about those shares? Yes, the 100 million that has increased - can we say exponentially? But, realistically, we know the game.
I have heard before how none of you responsible for this company will make any money until money is made. But, I submit there are various definitions of how money is made. In the case of the Federal Reserve, they print money. I think that is what you are doing. Here is how...
Increase the shares and, in so doing, ensure the pps remains low, which will be the price at which shares are awarded to those select few. Then, just before you announce the audit results and show how you have every thing under control - or at the same time - reveal the reverse split. Of course, with the number of shares awarded at such a low price, with what will be an expected run up in pps, your positions will increase. And, while it will be said that you will be required to hold the shares - for what, a year? - the news will remain positive and about 366 days later, in what will be described as normal estate planning by the officers and board members, the shares will be sold; slowly to not attract a lot of attention. But, sold nonetheless. And, this does not even address what the law firm and others will do with their shares. But, the net will be, we long term shareholders continue to be treated with disdain.
Charles Dickens wrote this play, did he not? Was it not called - The Tale of Two Cities? Did he not say it was the best of times and the worse of times? And, was it not because it reflected a dependence on context?
