InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,487.03
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,426.40
(
0.12%
)
Dow Jones
38,834.86
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
84.76
(
-0.04%
)
Bitcoin
65,242.36
(
0.16%
)
Post# of 59618
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Uninvited Guest

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2
Posts 37
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/06/2012

Uninvited Guest

Re: looking 4 a win post# 20489

Monday, 06/17/2013 6:54:46 PM

Monday, June 17, 2013 6:54:46 PM

Post# of 59618
Remember, this is from the defense (OCC). Of course they don't want this reviewed - this doc is their reasoning behind that. This is their motion, not a ruling of any kind.

Maybe I'm not reading into this enough, but this looks like the knife in the back.



Quote:
For these reasons, the Court should conclude that each of the three issues raised on
appeal are insubstantial and that a full briefing and oral argument would not
materially advance the disposition of this appeal. Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v.
Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297-298 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up