Any lawsuit filed against Treaty must be able to show cause, and prove the validity of such cause. If the suit is regarding work performed by a party for Treaty, then the plantiff must be able to prove without doubt that all actions were taken according to a contract, and all materials that were used were in compliance with a contract. And then there is the performance of the operation if that was a part or condition of the agreement, which it routinely is. If the plantiff can prove without any doubt that all activities called for in their suit, and can prove all materials met the standards required in the contract, and the action resulted in performance as prescribed in the contract, then they may have a valid case. HOWEVER, if there is doubt of any action or material or performance, as has been stated by someone in the field for Treaty, then the plantiffs may face an uphill battle just like the claimants did in their bandruptcy petition. And again, just like those claimants, the plantiffs will lose their case. Sounds as much like sour grapes again. But then a lot of companies have such suites against them and eventually win their cases, just like Treaty will win this one, again. Treaty is moving it forward. Get Ready!
