Conversion Solutions Holdings (fka CSHD)

[Increasecometh]

IMO, Ben Stanley does have a good point. Attorney King was incompetent to handle this case as he describes her actions or more likely the lack thereof. I was under the impression he hired and paid for her services which would make that his fault for not finding a more knowledgeable attorney. Was she a public defender?

I can see why Rufus told his lawyer (HM) to take a seat and he represented himself. This case was very technical and I don't think the jury understood what exactly happened here. What would have happened if Rufus didn't run? He didn't do Stanley and Horton any favors there. That act alone made him look guilty as sin. What was in exhibits H-1 through H-13 that showed Don Maddalon conspired with SEC and others to shift blame to Rufus. Why did so many people's testimony get thrown out if there's nothing to hide here...namely Merrill Lynch rep, Don Maddalon and Ann Nelkin.

My unanswered question:

1) How many shares were put in hard copy certificates. How many shares were sold by broker/dealers over the 31 Million float. What was the size of the naked short position?

2) Why did Rufus rely on Sabra Dabbs for acquiring the bonds to fund CSHD when he was supposed to be the Bond expert/ International bond trader. Why did Rufus sign off on the financials instead of the CFO?

3) Who filed the complaint with the SEC about CSHD possibly being a pump and dump. What proof did the SEC have at the time of the halt?

4) Were Alexander's 50 million shares that were cancelled by the merger agreement addressed in court? How about Perley's shares and profits?


The authorization for transfer of shares from Waatle to Conversion Solutions was stated in a press release. http://markets.financialcontent.com/stocks/news/read/244602/Conversion_Solutions_Holdings_Corp_Calls_for_all_Waatle_Holdings_Corp_Certificates_to_be_Exchanged_for_CSHD

The gifting of shares to family members was legal. Todd Harris and Leisa Stanley did nothing wrong by selling shares. Imo, it didn't look good but it was legal. Hiding the fact Perley was on the board of Fronthaul, not a consultant, and Alexander's transfer of 50 million cancelled shares were illegal. Perjury is illegal.

If witnesses are allowed to lie under oath without fear of jail time or penalty then how is justice served? That takes the teeth out of the law and the court room is rendered toothless. Am I the only one who feels the truth was conveniently swept under the rug here and a package of lies was sold in its place? I'm not saying Rufus is 100% in the right. Ben Stanley did get way to stiff of a sentence for his role in this. There's people who committed murder serving less time. I hope he does get a retrial.



Pages 131-133 are a must read.

Defendant claims ineffective assistance of counsel in the following areas: (1) failure to investigate or prepare (2) failure to study or understand security laws (3) Unable to ask appropriate questions, unable to prepare a proper defense, unable to impeach
witnesses for lying (6) failed to understand the nature ofthe conspiracy, failed to understand the nature and cause of the
charges, and she failed to under the nature and laws of contracts and contractural obligations. 90 Case 1:09-cr-00406-TCB-JFK Document 316 Filed 05/31/13 Page 131 of 135.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/145722559/USA-v-Harris-Doc-317-Filed-03-Jun-13