Wednesday, June 12, 2013 7:49:36 PM
There is a reason to keep the ratio low, that is if you are afraid of diluting your holdings. Since the reverse split is not accompanied by a reduction in the number of authorized shares it means that management could do offering or private placements of up to 75% of the current holdings at a 4 to 1 ration. That amount would be significantly greater, 90% at a 10 to one. You could maintain your ratio if you grant yourself a large enough share of the the stock (or you somehow build in a safeguard that does not dilute your holdings by issuing you share equal to what you dilution would have been).
So if your reasoning was to increase the price then a higher ration makes more sense - if you are looking to have more shares at a slightly higher price to so you can issue/sell more shares but not risk diluting your position in the company, a lower ratio is better.
I am hoping someone can tell me differently, but I don't see a good reason, with a current SP of below twenty cents, to only ask for a 4 to 1 reverse split.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM