InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

Re: None

Thursday, 12/15/2005 4:30:33 PM

Thursday, December 15, 2005 4:30:33 PM

Post# of 45771
Now if Loch/CDEx had a explosive detector like the one touted by p4316 and the Boyz that would be a different story, but they do not and never did according to wpoteet's confessions in his one and only RB post.

A XRF device which could detect trace explosives (PPB) at a stand-off distance of 2 meters in near real time was a pipe dream. The scamsters made a fortune off of that claim and shareholders would have too if it had been true.

Intersting how the PTO asked CDEx to clarify the stand-off distance. I find it interesting because I believe that there were other claims made which are already in the public domain that were obviously going to be rejected. For example, a stand alone claim of a portable XRF unit already exists. Interesting that that PTO ignored that and wanted CDEX to give a more specific answer on the stand-off distance.

I could be reading it wrong but I don't think so. Maybe some of those 3-letter agencies that Edge seems to think gave CDEx their blessings are doing more than just quietly lurking as some seem to think.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.