InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 991
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/07/2013

Re: joenatural post# 11176

Wednesday, 06/12/2013 7:13:43 AM

Wednesday, June 12, 2013 7:13:43 AM

Post# of 46516
Thanks for writing the article Joe. I understand what you mean when you write WDDD is a patent troll, but no matter how you spin it, the language you use is legally inaccurate, and in patent litigation, accuracy counts. Officially, WDDD is not a patent troll, and not even a Non-Practicing Entity (NPE), but is instead a Practicing Entity (PE). If they lose the Markman hearing, which I firmly don't believe they will, then no doubt the stock will plummet, but the high probability the stock will plummet if the Markman hearing is unsuccessful does not mean WDDD is a patent troll. With all due respect, the definition you use for "patent troll" is officially inaccurate, no matter how much you defend it. WDDD is a PE, per definition, and that is what matters. Other than that, I appreciate your article much. And again, thanks for writing it. I mean that.