InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1748
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/03/2004

Re: steltz02 post# 36791

Friday, 06/07/2013 3:41:20 PM

Friday, June 07, 2013 3:41:20 PM

Post# of 112780
steltz02:

Forgive me for failing to recognize that "technical analysis" is part of your investment decision process - - - obviously it is not mine - - - so
my apology if I offended you.

The hold up in any NBRI's PPS advancement seems then based upon 'technical signals" and not upon rational "fundamentals changes".
NBRI's PPS could therefore be stuck in this irrational place for a long time while every technical investor applies his own interpretation of these "signals" , and all for huge one or two "Penny Swing" ! As you can see, I'm not a big believer in technical trading for penny stocks, except for manipulation by aggressive traders. These "computer generated trades" with millions of shares trades per second executed seems best suited for technical trading.

If it works for you, then continue to use it. But it will take a "Valid Super PR by NBRI" announcing a 2000 ton find gold to break this chain of penny trades. JMHO

Walt Calahan
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y