InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,751.07
(
0.90%
)
US TECH 100
19,476.00
(
1.10%
)
Dow Jones
42,352.75
(
0.81%
)
Brent Oil
77.97
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
62,065.28
(
-0.01%
)
Post# of 77519
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

PoisonPill

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 70
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/02/2013

PoisonPill

Re: DamnedYankeeFan post# 60787

Friday, 06/07/2013 1:21:28 PM

Friday, June 07, 2013 1:21:28 PM

Post# of 77519
I see. So if these patents are so blatantly invalid according to your "public domain" argument, then why doesnt WebMD just show up to court, waive its right to challenge service of process, tell the court that the patent was public domain, obtain a dismissal on the merits and be done with it. The same goes for Walgreens. Oh, and why havent these patents been officially challenged at the patent office?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up