InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 17023
Next 10
Followers 4
Posts 555
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2004

Re: smd1234 post# 6685

Wednesday, 12/14/2005 1:59:37 AM

Wednesday, December 14, 2005 1:59:37 AM

Post# of 17023
Cal - looks like "(b) Requirements" of

SEC. 213. LIMITATION ON RECOVERY*

has no temporal aspect, i.e., if the leniency applicant <MU> fesses up to the claimant <RMBS>, "(b)" is satisfied no matter when that happens.

Agree?
--------------------
*
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_bills&docid=f:h1086enr.txt.pd...
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMBS News