InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 109
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/26/2012

Re: postyle post# 36225

Tuesday, 06/04/2013 5:31:57 PM

Tuesday, June 04, 2013 5:31:57 PM

Post# of 68424
Calling an opinion a fact does not make it one. Prices are facts, reasons for price movements are opinion. The day before the Becker depo issue arose again, the price was 3.01, the day after it was 2.83. That means the price move is likely the result of the Becker issue, but that still is opinion. With shorts standing on the neck of this stock, valuing a move over time due to any one exogenous event becomes troublesome. Perhaps I would have had less quarrel if the original post stated the early April rise was a one day event. But you link events weeks apart to attempt to come to a conclusion. Past the day of announcement, the number of variables are so great no one can state as fact that a single variable caused valuation, or a lasting change in valuation.

Perhaps if you re-read your original post, you will understand my point better, as you label both the price (a fact) and the reason for the price change (opinion) as facts.