![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Monday, June 03, 2013 3:14:05 PM
If they meant a "consortium" of all of Ulander's shell companies, that strikes me as a bit disingenuous. If I were a casual observer, I'd read "consortium" as a group of independent yet like-minded companies pooling their resources because the financial burden was too great for one entity to go it alone.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/consortium?s=t&path=/
Since Ulander appears to have been just shuffling the same paper money between companies, calling his group of entities a consortium is stretching it.
Question: rumor has it that there are upwards of 5 new companies looking at the ADL property and that they are all "reputable". I'd assume some of these were involved in the previous negotiations but Amarant was eventually selected as the winner. So if all of these companies are chomping at the bit for a piece of ADL now, why did Les, JJ and the BOD pass them up in favor of Amarant?
Malitia
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM