Monday, June 03, 2013 3:14:05 PM
If they meant a "consortium" of all of Ulander's shell companies, that strikes me as a bit disingenuous. If I were a casual observer, I'd read "consortium" as a group of independent yet like-minded companies pooling their resources because the financial burden was too great for one entity to go it alone.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/consortium?s=t&path=/
Since Ulander appears to have been just shuffling the same paper money between companies, calling his group of entities a consortium is stretching it.
Question: rumor has it that there are upwards of 5 new companies looking at the ADL property and that they are all "reputable". I'd assume some of these were involved in the previous negotiations but Amarant was eventually selected as the winner. So if all of these companies are chomping at the bit for a piece of ADL now, why did Les, JJ and the BOD pass them up in favor of Amarant?
Malitia
Lingerie Fighting Championships Signs Broadcast Deal With Maybacks Global Entertainment • BOTY • Sep 26, 2024 9:00 AM
Maybacks Global Entertainment and Lingerie Fighting Championships Enter Into Broadcast And Revenue Sharing Agreement • AHRO • Sep 26, 2024 8:30 AM
North Bay Resources Commences Operations at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California; Engages Sabean Group Management Consulting • NBRI • Sep 25, 2024 9:15 AM
CEO David B. Dorwart Anticipates a Bright Future at Good Gaming Inc. Through His Most Recent Shareholder Update • GMER • Sep 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • BLOZF • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • INTV • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM