InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 991
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/07/2013

Re: The Rainmaker post# 10401

Wednesday, 05/29/2013 12:40:14 AM

Wednesday, May 29, 2013 12:40:14 AM

Post# of 46516
My two cents: I'll be voting "Yes" to the increase in Authorized Shares, and "No" to the reverse split. If the patents have the inherent worth I believe they do, and that inherent worth is validated in the Markman hearing and proven in a court of law, there will be no reason for a reverse split: the share price will be $4.00-$7.00 without it. If non-institutional investors are unable, because unwilling, to increase the share price to $4.00/share or more in response to a positive Markman hearing and either a settlement or a win in court, then there is something inherently invaluable with the WDDD patents which a Reverse Split will not cure, but will in fact make worse for those invested.

Long story short, if the patents are as valuable as they are being claimed to be, a reverse split must necessarily be unnecessary, and should be, therefore, in my opinion, avoided (voted against).

But this is just my opinion and my vote...what do I know.