InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1869
Posts 90277
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/02/2006

Re: Ipittydafoo post# 35121

Sunday, 05/26/2013 5:05:34 PM

Sunday, May 26, 2013 5:05:34 PM

Post# of 68424
A raid "could" occur simply by a fund/s deciding to dump on news that causes a possible panic and stops get taken out and they do it for just that reason. To take the stops out. Ever heard the term, Sell on News? Additionally, even though Vringo won a unanimous jury verdict it also imo is determined by how it is reported to the investing community. Did you see how CNBC reported the victory?
I agree about MSFT which is why this was included in my post.
not realizing the value going forward and what this decision from the HJJ could bring to this.
Notwithstanding the possible addition to the Russell index or ZTE suits.
I've been here a year now and have seen too many of the catalysts go by the wayside.
My point of only getting 3.5% and not 7% and emotions is we should not set ourselves up for failure in our own eyes. We need to acknowledge that we may get the 3.5% of 20.9% which would be large in itself.
In other words if we are realistic and we under promise to ourselves and the HJJ over-delivers, all the better.
I have a rather large chunk of shares in the game that are long and I hope to get a few more base hits before the next catalyst.
Best to all.