InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 5883
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/02/2011

Re: penniesbgone post# 23381

Friday, 05/24/2013 5:39:28 PM

Friday, May 24, 2013 5:39:28 PM

Post# of 23971
O I have several times

1) "I did not want to have that burden put 100% on NHSH and its shareholders. That was the desire of both parties."

so mark picked the number didnt he? and it was the desire of both parties?..... okay the parties of whom?
a) the parties of mark-N and ms/mk?
b) or the parties of joe-Q and ms-MK.
c) or the parties of nhsh-MO/JOE and ms.
d) or the parties of mark-N and joe-Q

MARK SAID BOTH PARTIES, in your opinion which two parties.

2) "I have had my lawyer’s office contact NHSH and let them know the good news that the balance owed by NHSH is now reduced to $72,109.00, plus interest.".....
a)so why 72K+ IOW why not $72K
b) why the extra one hundred and nine bucks.

In your opinion why?

3) marks letter/email sez $662K correct?
a) how come the amount saved to NHSH is not $550K?
b) why is not the amount left onto NHSH plate not $72K
those totals (tex has come up with) are also $662K

see ole tex can pick numbers as easy as anybody.
it is marks $662K.....
easy to see why joe/quasar would doubt lmk tia
jmho

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.