>>I'm a little confused as well by the article, does it mean that there won't be a JV with Waterton or is that news still not out of the bag and confirmed
There was never a JV in the cards - that was completely a figment of the collective imagination on this board. The Asset Purchase Agreement with Waterton has been in the public domain for weeks - it's the official terms of the sale and there was no reference to a JV. There is nothing to be confused about.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.