InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 223
Posts 9492
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 09/16/2010

Re: NASCOW post# 20187

Wednesday, 05/22/2013 1:25:52 PM

Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:25:52 PM

Post# of 33394
Depends on which one you want to go by.

If we go by the original it's not up for 20yrs.

The other two extensions were given in BK court but still were done under the original contract terms.
Review every five years and by PB side depositions they were happy with Play Bev & Cirtran. PB even sent letters out on their behalf to not only keep vendors but secure more and that was 2011. And as PB put it they weren't concerned with sales because they knew how hard everyone was working and how daunting this ( PBED launch all over the world) was.

Even PB top Executives didn't think Jimmy and Redi were going to do better. It was that if Jommy could pull it off it would mean more money for PB and a shorter length in contract. All the while the emails going back and fourth saying don't let Cirtran find out because its a breach of contract and we could be sued. OUCH

Those same Top PB executives call Jimmy Esebag a liar. Could that be why he has now appeared with his own attorneys?? Oh what a tangled web this is that was woven.
All from pacer.gov