InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 10
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/15/2013

Re: None

Tuesday, 05/21/2013 7:26:30 PM

Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:26:30 PM

Post# of 202
The U.S. Could Indict SAC Capital, But Should It?

The knives are out -- and the media feeding frenzy is on -- for Steven A. Cohen and his $15 billion hedge fund, SAC Capital Advisors.
The firm last week told its investors in a letter that it no longer will cooperate unconditionally with federal investigators, and that the updates it provides about the progress of the government’s probe may be scant. The New York Times has reported that Cohen received a subpoena to testify before a grand jury.

There has been lots of speculation about what this means. SAC clients will have to make decisions about whether to keep their money there, even if the information available to them is imperfect. What does the future hold for Cohen individually? He may not know himself. One thing we can conclude: The government probably has enough evidence to indict SAC Capital or one of its subsidiaries already. The question of whether it should indict is another matter.
At least nine current or former SAC employees have been linked to insider trading while working at the firm, including four who have pleaded guilty to crimes, according to Bloomberg News’s tally.

check out full article here... http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-20/the-u-s-could-indict-sac-capital-but-should-it-.html
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.