InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 109
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/26/2012

Re: JJSeabrook post# 34704

Tuesday, 05/21/2013 2:01:48 PM

Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:01:48 PM

Post# of 68424
They are asking the judge to limit the RR based upon the work around. No work around, no argument to limit the RR. That is the only "validation" they seek, and why VRNG properly points out if GOOG had a work arond, they should be arguing for a lump sum because of it, not a reduced RR.