InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 8449
Next 10
Followers 100
Posts 7904
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/04/2012

Re: tste9 post# 345

Monday, 05/20/2013 9:41:39 PM

Monday, May 20, 2013 9:41:39 PM

Post# of 8449
Does it have barring on the company? Enough that they felt it prudent to add as an amendment to the prospectus. Does it directly correlate to the pending merger and subsequent IP infringement suit? I doubt it, not directly anyway. I am a layman when it comes to the logistics of Fund minimum criteria for investment and cannot begin to breach this subject without deferring to any more knowledgable than myself in this respect.
My initial reaction would be that this was in a effort to effectuate more favorable terms by which to attract big money, funds, TUTS to ultimately take more money out of shaky retail hands and put it into "old money" institutions. This could facilitate a solid platform in preparation of entry into merger and ultimately maintain SEC compliance so as to avoid RS or worse. But again, that is just my take on a subject with which I am not familiar. Any help is appreciated here from the board.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent DSS News