Sharp's suit is a non-issue and most people don't understand what it is about.
He is suing on an anti-spam statue, NOT on any principle of fraud or misrepresentation.
So the ONLY issue that will be germane to the suit is whether he and others received UNSOLICITED e-mails, texts, or faxes touting the stock, with the emphasis on UNSOLICITED.
What the suit IS NOT about and will not be allowed is any question as to the legitimacy or value of the companies being touted or the motives of the promoter, APS.
So the only questions to be answered in the suit are:
1) Did he and others receive e-mails, faxes, or texts touting the stock, yes or no?; AND
2) If so can APS show proof that the recipient e-mails and/or fax or text numbers had at any time opted in to receive such communications, yes or no?
That's it. Nothing else can be discussed. This whole thing is just a smoke screen to aid short sellers.
