InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 110
Posts 6480
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/01/2003

Re: lasers post# 53086

Sunday, 05/19/2013 11:27:41 AM

Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:27:41 AM

Post# of 92948
The only reason the "Caldwell estate" was involved is because A/G
claimed securities fraud(backdating warrants) specific to Bill Caldwell. Once the Judge dismissed those charges the Caldwell estate was no longer a party to the case..


"The proposed Second Amended Complaint is a global replacement of the First Amended Complaint and eliminates the securities law claims and the Engstrom transaction in its entirety. Further, the Calwell estate is no longer a party to the case. Instead of the earlier securities-based claims, the proposed Second Amended Complaint sounds entirely in contract and seeks legal and equitable relief from a series of transactions between ACT and third parties which Plaintiff alleges should have caused ACT to issue additional shares to Plaintiff during the contractual "pricing period." Each such transaction, including the transactions on which the SEC bases its claims, is alleged as a separate claim for relief."

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.