InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 69
Posts 12025
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/01/2009

Re: RealDutch post# 37666

Thursday, 05/16/2013 7:08:49 AM

Thursday, May 16, 2013 7:08:49 AM

Post# of 163721
RD: I agree with Orreborren that net margin is 29%. While gross profit(ability) only reflects Cost of Goods and doesnt change with who owns what % of the business (controlling interests), net profit or net margin does IMO b/c it reflects all the other costs of doing business including that of paying some of the profit to the controlling interests. As a shareholder, I Donot really care about the absolute profitability at the "gross margin" level. I only care about what me as the s/h gets "paid". In other words, even if the gross margin is huge (say 90%) but the business is 99% owned by non-shareholders, we as s/h get quasi zero net profit. That's how I have calculated the net margin all the time (Net of controlling interests).

The reason why NM is so low this quarter ( and from now on IMO) is ( besides the lower price of sleepy cod) b/c many projects that are co- owned by JV partners start now to show a profit including the wholesale centers and the fertilizer segment. In the past, most of the profits came from the service rev (100% for us) and from FF1 of which we currently own 75%.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.