XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[Realizer]

I agree, if the judge was interested in hearing arguments about a "work around" he would have taken advantage of the opportunity in the last response by Google. However, we are not in the mind of the judge all we can do is speculate to how he is thinking based on his prior judgements and comments. Google may have hit on something that catches his interest but I believe he will follow through with the denied judgement already placed upon the bringing up of a "work around" as he should. Google shouldn't even be able bring this issue up even after the RR ruling until it is "implemented" and "confirmed" non-infringing by the PTO and possibly by another non-bias 3rd party expert. Saying something and proving beyond a doubt in a court of law are two different things. IMO