Rambus (RMBS)

[smd1234]

Payne never comes back with the reasonable Q for a Judge:

<Sammy, having made it clear on the cc that they won't "accept" the offer>

So why doesn't he ask:
"Will you (Sammy) accept the rule 68 offer?"
Then Sammy can say "no (or hedge if they truly are unsure)"

He is just a terrible judge (in addition to the faults we've all come to know).

So he now has a 12/15 hearing set -- despite having given Rambus 'til 12/21 to file a response to Sammy's 12/14 filing.

grrrrrrrr
==============
I would think that the way to do this is for you

9 to go ahead and do it, file that pleading on

10 December 14, the day after your acceptance is due. For

11 if you choose to accept it and there's no further

12 matter to be decided, then nothing needs to be done.

13 If you choose to fight it or to say there's something

14 left, then you need to explain why.

15 In the meantime, Rambus should go ahead and

16 proceed and file its papers as per the November 8th

17 order. We will have the hearing on December the 15th.

18 Samsung will have to file its reply under the

19 November 8th order. Rambus will have a right of reply

20 to what you file on December the 14th, and it can file

21 its reply on December the 21st.