InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 34
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/03/2013

Re: None

Monday, 05/13/2013 11:27:00 PM

Monday, May 13, 2013 11:27:00 PM

Post# of 68424
HJJ already ignored GOOG's point related to the workaround earlier in their previous motion (in April). He didn't give any significance to it and ordered to respond in 10 days.

Seriously, who are they to decide that their workaround doesn't infringe 420/664? If it was that simple, then all the infringing parties would come up and say hey we have a workaround so we are not infringing so please close the case. Sounds really ridiculous.

I strongly believe HJJ would say, Congrats for coming up with a "workaround" so fast..but you know what? You still owe VRNG money..file a new case and prove in a court (that your workaround doesn't infringe the patents. But until then, you need to pay at X% RR.

Did GOOG release this workaround info. to SEC. They need to inform their investors that they are introducing this workaround which might affect the revenue. VRNG can easily bring this one up to trash their workaround theory but they don't even have to go that far. GOOG is desperate and it is showing.